Film Fun Facts

Buster, Whizzer and Chips, Whoopee, Wham, Smash, you name it!

Moderator: AndyB

User avatar
philcom55
Posts: 5170
Joined: 14 Jun 2006, 11:56

Re: Film Fun

Post by philcom55 »

matrix wrote:...is there any chance that we could see whether Mr Wun Fang got to see the famous Liver?
But of course! (naturally it turns out to be the one by the emblankment! :) )

Image

- Phil R.

matrix
Posts: 817
Joined: 03 Sep 2011, 12:37

Re: Film Fun

Post by matrix »

Thanks Phil (that was quick) great stuff! I think growing up watching him on tv makes that strip more appealing.

User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Film Fun

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

I appreciate the depiction of young women in these strips---we never got to see this sort of thing in the BEANO, naturally!

It's not every comics artist that can draw effective attractive women: a bit like good caricaturing, it's a rarer gift, which says a heck of a lot about the talents and ability of Wakefield and other Greats.

User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Film Fun

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

Lew Stringer wrote:



Well, it's all part of the factory system of getting comics out on time I suppose. I can't really see any harm in another artist drawing the heads if the rest of the strip is of the same high quality, - which I think it was in the case of Film Fun. Better that, than having an artist not so good at caricatures spending hours trying to get it right.

I don't think I'd heard of that particular method before, Rab, but I had heard of how Film Fun reprinted old strips and added new heads on the stars to reflect whoever was in vogue at the time. Now that was being cheeky!

As a cartoonist, Lew, you must surely enjoy doing the facial expressions, one of the most enjoyable parts of the job!

But yes, there are many real good fantasy cartoon artists who just don't have the spark required to assemble good-quality caricatures, hence the need for Editor Fred Cordwells pragmatic approach regarding this method.

User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Film Fun

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

As a direct result of joining in on these posts, I've just ordered a second-hand copy of the Alan Clark book, which impressed me greatly at the time---it cost 14 pounds 95 in 1989, out of my price range at the time [comics work had dried up at that time and I was living off my savings until I got employment in the Animation Industry in 1990]:


Image

I picked it up for a fifth of the original face value: dunno if it even has a dust-jacket---would be nice if it did have.

Kashgar
Guru
Posts: 2781
Joined: 09 Nov 2006, 14:15

Re: Film Fun

Post by Kashgar »

Firstly Phil sorry for calling you Steve at the top of my last post but one. I'd just been on the phone to my son Steve when I was writing the entry and well, let's just call it a senior moment!
Re Frank Minnitt he did find work other than Bunter hard to come by in his latter years but then again he was still producing two Bunter pages per week right up until the time of his death in May 1958 aged 64. So he did die in harness unlike Terry Wakefield.
I think we should also point out here that after the death of Billy Wakefield in 1942 the mainstay on his strips wasn't his son Terry, who was away on war service but Norman Ward whose work continued to appear in Film Fun right up to the time of his sudden death, aged 54, in 1959. Ward's work, although I think quite distinctive, often being mistaken for that of Terry Wakefield's in the 1950's.

Oh, and thanks to everyone who has went to the bother of greeting me on my return to the forum. It is much appreciated. It is nice to be back.

User avatar
philcom55
Posts: 5170
Joined: 14 Jun 2006, 11:56

Re: Film Fun

Post by philcom55 »

Feel free to call me whatever you like Kashgar; I know all about 'senior moments'! :)

That's a great buy Rab, I'm sure you won't regret it. I was really pleased to see Alan back in print with The Sloperian recently - I hope there are more issues in the works! (who knows, there might even be a second volume of The Best of British Comic Art some day!)

Speaking of pretty girls and identikit images, I'm reminded that the two were combined in 'The Beverley Sisters' - surely one of the weirdest strips that ever appeared in Film Fun's companion title Radio Fun (though without the help of Mr. Cordwell's sticky-back heads in this instance!).

Image

Image

I could be wrong but these both seem to be late examples of work by Bertie Brown - the legendary Charlie Chaplin artist dealt with in the first chapter of Alan's book.

- Phil Rushton

Kashgar
Guru
Posts: 2781
Joined: 09 Nov 2006, 14:15

Re: Film Fun

Post by Kashgar »

Yes Phil. It is the work of Bertie Brown.

User avatar
stevezodiac
Posts: 4957
Joined: 23 May 2006, 20:43
Location: space city

Re: Film Fun

Post by stevezodiac »

As previously mentioned by me I have hundreds of Film Fun pencil roughs drawn by Wally Robertson who drew many different characters including Max Miller, Joe E Brown and George Formby. I also have some try outs for a Bob Monkhouse strip with notes to him from Denis Gifford - was looking at it a couple of weeks ago but can't find it now.

User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Film Fun

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

Those [SATIRE: 'SASSY BABES' END SATIRE] in the previous two strips have quite an effect on me--they are only pen-and-ink drawings, but boy are they effective.

Lew Stringer
Posts: 7041
Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 00:59
Contact:

Re: Film Fun

Post by Lew Stringer »

ISPYSHHHGUY wrote:I appreciate the depiction of young women in these strips---we never got to see this sort of thing in the BEANO, naturally!

It's not every comics artist that can draw effective attractive women: a bit like good caricaturing, it's a rarer gift, which says a heck of a lot about the talents and ability of Wakefield and other Greats.
From what I was told by bodgers (staff art assistants) who worked in boys comics in the 1970s, IPC actively discouraged any sexiness in female characters, getting the bodgers to decrease the bust size or white out any hint of cleavage (or lengthen skirts). A complete contrast to the AP attitude of 20 years earlier, as evidenced by the Film Fun examples here, of leggy women and their clinging tops. :D

Phoenix
Guru
Posts: 5360
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 21:15

Re: Film Fun

Post by Phoenix »

ISPYSHHHGUY wrote:Those [SATIRE: 'SASSY BABES' END SATIRE] in the previous two strips have quite an effect on me--they are only pen-and-ink drawings, but boy are they effective.
I think it might be a very good idea, Rab, if you put comics aside for a while, and get stuck in to a healthy dose of post-war text story papers. The only women in those are fat, jovial landladies, and the occasional footballer's homely wife.

AndyB
Throgmorton
Posts: 2322
Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 20:00
Contact:

Re: Film Fun

Post by AndyB »

Lew Stringer wrote:From what I was told by bodgers (staff art assistants) who worked in boys comics in the 1970s, IPC actively discouraged any sexiness in female characters, getting the bodgers to decrease the bust size or white out any hint of cleavage (or lengthen skirts). A complete contrast to the AP attitude of 20 years earlier, as evidenced by the Film Fun examples here, of leggy women and their clinging tops. :D
Same with DCT - every woman in the humour comics was flat-chested until the late 80s.

Tom Paterson and Bob Nixon were among the first to break that mould for IPC (but hardly the only ones), and certainly Bob was the first to do it on his return to DCT. The likes of Mike Lacey, Ron Spencer and Dave Sutherland have never been known for busty women in their comic strips.

Kashgar
Guru
Posts: 2781
Joined: 09 Nov 2006, 14:15

Re: Film Fun

Post by Kashgar »

Then again there are tales about sex obssessed young men in the Thomson papers. Who can forget the yarn 'Chained to his bat' !

Phoenix
Guru
Posts: 5360
Joined: 27 Mar 2008, 21:15

Re: Film Fun

Post by Phoenix »

AndyB wrote:Same with DCT - every woman in the humour comics was flat-chested until the late 80s
But not necessarily in the picture story papers, even in the seventies. See the examples below from Spellbound.
Kashgar wrote:Then again there are tales about sex obssessed young men in the Thomson papers.
They were probably reading Spellbound.
Attachments
Supercats1.jpg
Supercats2.jpg

Post Reply