Page 3 of 5

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 29 Aug 2011, 18:40
by Peter Gray
Biffo the bear was a bit like Rupert the bear...very human...almost a human with a bear head on..
Korky was much more cat like..

though the early Biffos were more bear like..before he evolved..

Mickey the monkey was also more monkey like in the early days as well..

don't know if these posts need to be moved to talking about DC Thomson cover stars..could be a good topic on its own..

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 29 Aug 2011, 18:47
by Raven
Tin Can Tommy wrote: I really think alot of the time Korky can be just used in any situation seeing as the guy was on about Korky having no consistent characterisation in the new strips it is true for the old strips apart from the occassional ones you talk about where he does cat things like battle mice and being a smart cookie pretty much every comic character is like that sometimes but in other strips i bet he wasnt like that at all more of a clumsy oaf or maybe that was Biffo.

A few full stops would have been nice there, Tin Can!

Korky was generally what I said - being a smart cookie who uses his ingenuity to overturn situations isn't really a trait of pretty much every character. Barney bulldog, for example, Sparky's cover star, was more one of life's victims, whose attempts to take control of things or assert authority usually went wrong, with him ending up the butt of the gag in the last panel.

Granted, they're not characters of Dostoyevskian depths; their main purpose was to provide a good, eye-catching visual gag for the front cover. The new Korky, though, seems more a hook for the writer to hang his random thoughts of the week on. I think the look is fine, but that the simple style of the art ultimately works against strong visual storytelling; the characters tend to be quite static, often just standing and talking, or sitting and talking for several panels.

I agree that Ginger was fairly bland; I thought Ginger as the cover star possibly gave Beezer a bit of a bland feel by association, which wasn't really fair as it had a few of Thomson's best strips inside.

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 29 Aug 2011, 20:22
by Tin Can Tommy
Personally i think the reason for the 'bland' cover stars is because in new comics if you have a strongly characterised character on the front its a bit of a risk, he may end up unpopular whereas with 'bland' characters they not usually unpopular just not people's favourite strip. As well as this when a less bland strip gets popular they can put it on the cover because they already know people will like it.

Also this cover star discussion probably as Peter Gray suggested deserves its own thread. Discussion of DC Thomson cover stars duzzn't really have anything t'do with a new Jim Petrie page.

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 29 Aug 2011, 20:28
by Peter Gray

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 30 Aug 2011, 14:44
by swirlythingy
dishes wrote:
big bad bri wrote:i thought i was the only one here who liked harry hills strip as most seem to slate it even though it is current with the celebs and the art is fantastic
I'm right with you there. I hate celebrity culture and I don't watch TV but the thing about the Harry Hill strip, going on the episodes I've read, is that many of the jokes are (gasp) actually funny!
Yep, I'm with this too. Like others, the celebrity aspect was a bit of a turn-off for me at first, but I've grown to really like the strip and its rapid-fire jokes and storytelling. (Even if it does occasionally fall over when trying to be up to the minute - last week's strip, along with the rest of the comic, was full of references to Murdoch's shaving foam pie! Not exactly Drop the Dead Donkey, eh?)

But I don't think anything will persuade me to like Little Celebs or the new covers, or for that matter the two pages recently given over to celebrities every week either...

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 30 Aug 2011, 15:06
by Scoobie
swirlythingy wrote:I'm right with you there...... etc
I refer the visually challenged gentleman to the post directly above his...
Peter Gray wrote:http://www.comicsuk.co.uk/Forum/viewtop ... f=1&t=4436
topic continues here..
8)

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 30 Aug 2011, 15:47
by Tin Can Tommy
Scoobie wrote:
swirlythingy wrote:I'm right with you there...... etc
I refer the visually challenged gentleman to the post directly above his...
Peter Gray wrote:http://www.comicsuk.co.uk/Forum/viewtop ... f=1&t=4436
topic continues here..
8)

his post wasnt really about DC Thomson cover stars though, was it?

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 30 Aug 2011, 15:51
by Phoenix
Scoobie wrote:I refer the visually challenged gentleman to the post directly above his...
Why could you not just have said, Can I refer Swirly to the post directly above his...? By using the expression visually challenged gentleman, you are yet again insulting Swirly. Can you not see this, Scoobie?

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 31 Aug 2011, 09:54
by Scoobie
Tin Can Tommy wrote:his post wasnt really about DC Thomson cover stars though, was it?
Is the thread title about DC Thomson cover stars, Tommy?

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 31 Aug 2011, 10:06
by -MikeD-
Scoobie wrote:
Tin Can Tommy wrote:his post wasnt really about DC Thomson cover stars though, was it?
Is the thread title about DC Thomson cover stars, Tommy?
Scooby, you've got to stop behaving like a troll on this board. I know most forums descend into aggressive cock swinging contests eventually, but we're trying to keep this one good natured and informative.

Speaking personally, I'm getting fed up of clicking threads and finding one of your deliberately antagonistic posts...

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 03 Oct 2011, 15:42
by yanobandy
Must mention: Entered this competition on beano.com. My puns were: Strictly bun Dancing, Currynation Street, Sweet the Nation, The Fat in the Hat, Fatman, (I) Scream and The Incredible Bulk. Not bad, eh?

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 03 Oct 2011, 16:17
by Jonny Whizz
I didn't enter the competition, but I think 'Curse of the Were-Rarebit' would be a good name for a Fatty Fudge film parody!

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 03 Oct 2011, 16:23
by WizzKid97
I entered quite a few in the competition. These are the ones I remember a the moment but there were more!

> The Ka-Lardy Kid (The Karate Kid)
> Fat-tain America (Captain America)
> The Green Lard-ton (The Green Latern)
> Larderman (Spiderman) Fatty
> Scoffer and the Goblet of Soda (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire)
> Fatty Scoffer: The Order at the Phoenix Restaurant (Harry Potter: the Order of the Phoenix)
> Iron (Stomach) Man (Iron Man)
> Fatty Scoffer and the Half Pound Fruitcake (Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince)
> The Fast (Food) and The Fatty-us (The Fast and the Furious)
> Flabby McPhee (Nanny McPhee)
> The Princess and the Hog (The Princess and the Frog)
> Fatman: The Midnight Feast Returns (Batman: The Dark Knight Returns)
> Back to the Takeaway (Back to the Future)
> A-lard-din (Aladdin)
> The Spy Stuck in Next Door's Door (The Spy Next Door)

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 05 Oct 2011, 22:31
by yanobandy
WizzKid97 wrote:I entered quite a few in the competition. These are the ones I remember a the moment but there were more!

> The Ka-Lardy Kid (The Karate Kid)
> Fat-tain America (Captain America)
> The Green Lard-ton (The Green Latern)
> Larderman (Spiderman) Fatty
> Scoffer and the Goblet of Soda (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire)
> Fatty Scoffer: The Order at the Phoenix Restaurant (Harry Potter: the Order of the Phoenix)
> Iron (Stomach) Man (Iron Man)
> Fatty Scoffer and the Half Pound Fruitcake (Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince)
> The Fast (Food) and The Fatty-us (The Fast and the Furious)
> Flabby McPhee (Nanny McPhee)
> The Princess and the Hog (The Princess and the Frog)
> Fatman: The Midnight Feast Returns (Batman: The Dark Knight Returns)
> Back to the Takeaway (Back to the Future)
> A-lard-din (Aladdin)
> The Spy Stuck in Next Door's Door (The Spy Next Door)
Well, if you want to get these ideas noticed, post them on Beano.com. "ahem", you COUlD (but just if you want to) post there, cos there's only an hour-and a half left for posting.

Re: new Jim Petrie page?

Posted: 05 Oct 2011, 22:33
by Digifiend
I believe he already did! :lol: