Re: Roger the Dodger, #3583
Posted: 09 May 2011, 21:54
I agreed with your post, which contained a lot of truths, quite the opposite to our favourite Beano-Basher who posts as if they're truthful but only contains suggestions, opinions based on little or zero facts, devoid of etiquette, personality and tact.MikeC wrote:If I can clarify, my comment was aimed at swirlythingy, but more as a gentle reminder that, in a thread already defaced by poor taste not fitting with the general tone of this forum, sometimes the way you say things can be as important as what you say.
In no way was I sanctioning what Scoobie said, and if he felt I did, he wasn't reading closely enough.
If that's his 'bag', he's welcome to it.