I must dash NCIS is on in ten minutes.






Metro is a month late with the news, which must be some sort of record. The internet split in half with DC's news on May 31st and I posted about it on my blog on June 1st.Phoenix wrote:Today's Metro is clearly playing catch-up. I posted the basic information on 23 June on the Peter Parker RIP! thread. Furthermore, as I discovered later that day, Lew's blog had posted the same details several days earlier.
Speaking as a DC reader of 35 years standing who was basically drawn into it in the first place by fascination at the rich and complex history of the company-if all of that, and espacially Golden Age characters such as the Justice Society, are being dumped (as seems to be the case), I can't see any point in continuing to buy any DC books after the reboot. DC have already cancelled virtually every title I was still reading, anyway.paw broon wrote:I was out with some pals yesterday, all of them comics fans and they were all concerned about this. They were also of a mind that it was a really bad idea. First comment was that readers would say that as the comics were reverting to #1's, this would be a good time to jump off, not on. As for digital releases, some of us think this will do serious damage to the indy comic shops in the U.K. Remember Marvel? They tried something similar and soon reverted.
I'm off to my lcs this afternoon and hopefully have a chat about this as well as having a look round the shelves.
It's not just the #1's but the re-tooling of the DC universe. It's all coming over as a bit too heavy for me. Only time will tell.
I must admit I don't understand people's animosity towards this relaunch. It's not the first time DC have done something like this. (Albeit not on such a grand scale.) As long as the script and art entertains I don't see any problem. The main characters are remaining, so fans can still follow them, and the JSA (canceled due to poor sales) will return eventually.tony ingram wrote: Speaking as a DC reader of 35 years standing who was basically drawn into it in the first place by fascination at the rich and complex history of the company-if all of that, and espacially Golden Age characters such as the Justice Society, are being dumped (as seems to be the case), I can't see any point in continuing to buy any DC books after the reboot. DC have already cancelled virtually every title I was still reading, anyway.
I had a similar issue to come to terms with when I realised that when Thomsons brought out The Victor in 1961, a significant aspect of their policy was converting text stories I knew and loved into pictures. I no longer have any problem with this, but I have to admit it used to be disconcerting. At the most basic level, all instalments lacked much of the substance of the originals, but where I felt most offended was when they began to change storylines, and even plots. From that point onwards I was obviously reading a different story. I'm not saying that there was anything wrong with that story, or even of the many sequels that had never even been presented in text form. They were new, they were interesting but they weren't the stories I knew. Most of my favourite characters had to undergo these revisions, major figures such as Alf Tupper, Nick Smith, Limp Along Leslie, Wilson, Blockbuster Brown, Craig Crane, Huck McFee etc became the lynchpins of the new picture papers. Some of my other favourites never even made it into these young upstarts. Even individual one-off serials such as Gorgeous Gus and The Goalmaker acquired a rich and extended life, but they just weren't the same. By the time The Goalmaker reached Scoop, Pickford had been renamed Capper for no apparent reason, and the story was only recognisable here and there. I realise, of course, that text to pictures is not the same as pictures to pictures but the decision by DC to adapt old stories for new readers thirty-five years on is essentially no different from Thomsons' in 1961. There are different reasons for buying into it or not, none of them wrong, ultimately it is just down to individual preference. Tony may take some comfort from knowing that I adapted eventually.tony ingram wrote:Speaking as a DC reader of 35 years standing who was basically drawn into it in the first place by fascination at the rich and complex history of the company-if all of that, and espacially Golden Age characters such as the Justice Society, are being dumped (as seems to be the case), I can't see any point in continuing to buy any DC books after the reboot.Lew Stringer wrote:I must admit I don't understand people's animosity towards this relaunch. It's not the first time DC have done something like this. (Albeit not on such a grand scale.) As long as the script and art entertains I don't see any problem. The main characters are remaining, so fans can still follow them, and the JSA (canceled due to poor sales) will return eventually.
Look on the bright side Tony. In August, after 35 years you get to see how the stories end! That's better than following a soap that will probably continue long beyond our lifetimes.
I'm interested to see the stylistic changes they're bringing in/back to appeal to new readers.