Les Barton

Discuss comic art, the artists and writers both current and from the past.

Moderators: Al, AndyB

Lew Stringer
Posts: 7041
Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 00:59
Contact:

Re: Les Barton

Post by Lew Stringer »

Niblet wrote:Lovely set of postcards. Did anyone ever actually post a saucy card? - I remember people standing enjoying the racks (of postcards!) outside the seafront shops, but no-one ever seemed to buy them.
Oh definitely, yes. I've received some and used to post some too, to mates when I was on holiday.

They're quite collectible. Some shops still sell them now. Gift shop on the corner of Station Street and Bond Street in Blackpool for one.
The blog of British comics: http://lewstringer.blogspot.com
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
User avatar
stevezodiac
Posts: 5210
Joined: 23 May 2006, 20:43
Location: space city

Re: Les Barton

Post by stevezodiac »

Colin, the Sugar Jones strip has a signature on it - BUSOM?

Just googled "Buson" and found a page about Rafael Busom Clúa a Spanish artist who is the artist for Sugar Jones. No doubt RuthB can enlighten us further.
User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Les Barton

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

you are certainly no 'sleazeball' Matrix, and your comments are more than welcome! I'm not to sure when the photostrip phenomenon began, but by about 1979 it was very big indeed, and eventually there was hardly any trad-drawn strips left in the girl's mags........
Lew Stringer
Posts: 7041
Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 00:59
Contact:

Re: Les Barton

Post by Lew Stringer »

ISPYSHHHGUY wrote:you are certainly no 'sleazeball' Matrix, and your comments are more than welcome!
Before this gets any more mixed up can I just repeat that at no point did I think Matrix was being a "sleazeball"! I simply thought that when he presented illustrations from girl's comics into a discussion about "saucy" adult cartoons that he'd innocently misunderstood the topic of conversation, that's all. My "hopefully never the twain shall meet" was a general comment about this forum, not a criticism of Matrix.
The blog of British comics: http://lewstringer.blogspot.com
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Les Barton

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

chill out, Lew----many of my comments are deliberately tongue-in-cheek, old son!!!!!!


You work in a humorous field, ferchrissakes!!!!!!
User avatar
stevezodiac
Posts: 5210
Joined: 23 May 2006, 20:43
Location: space city

Re: Les Barton

Post by stevezodiac »

Yes but the written word cannot convey the levity intended. Maybe you should add an emoticon - I just did - its not really me but it does let the reader know you are only joking.
User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Les Barton

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

hmmm-----and here's me thinking you guys all had a sophistickayted sense of humour that doesn't have to be clearly signposted: I actually left another well-known cartoon-related site fairly recently coz I felt a significant amount of the members'ciomments and postings were humourless and pretentious.

I'm not saying that's happening on here,---it isn't, this is a very laid-back site, the main reason I am still here------- and sure enough if I am in a silly mood when I post , it doesn't mean that other members are in the same frame of mind at the same time as me.....



I may well take up your 'signpost' idea Steve, I'll see.


What about this, chaps: if I do a deliberately silly post [which I do often} does anyone object if I add the following 'top and tail' to the post in question?;


++++SATIRE+++++++++SATIRE+++++++++SATIRE+++++++++++SATIRE++++++++======

I prefer this to emoticons, which are 'cute' but overused I reckon.

Your answers----if any---on a postcard, purleeze, but may I remind you that the price of postage stamps have rocketed from today.



I nicked this idea from Monty Python, so I can't claim credit on this one.......
User avatar
swirlythingy
Posts: 562
Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 00:16
Location: Wimbledon, UK

Re: Les Barton

Post by swirlythingy »

ISPYSHHHGUY wrote:What about this, chaps: if I do a deliberately silly post [which I do often} does anyone object if I add the following 'top and tail' to the post in question?;


++++SATIRE+++++++++SATIRE+++++++++SATIRE+++++++++++SATIRE++++++++======

I prefer this to emoticons, which are 'cute' but overused I reckon.
I have to admit, I have seriously thought about taking similarly drastic action in the past. I've had lots of posts misunderstood or taken the wrong way in my year on Comics UK - somewhat more than the general average, I reckon - and sometimes the results have been very nasty indeed. I share your misgivings about emoticons, and I try to use them as little as possible, because I feel that if they're necessary to add clarity to a post, then you plainly haven't made your post clear enough. It's like wearing a rubber mask with a smile painted on because you can't muster up a real one. But I'm increasingly coming to the conclusion that in reality, no matter how well I understand them, the tone of my posts doesn't translate nearly as well as I think it does.

The main thing I find baffling is that I've had a much easier time on every other forum/blog I've posted in - including comic-related ones - apart from Comics UK. There seems to be something particularly sensitive about this site.
Help! Help! We're being held prisoner in a signature factory!
Raven
Posts: 2829
Joined: 16 Aug 2007, 22:58
Location: Highboro'

Re: Les Barton

Post by Raven »

stevezodiac wrote:Yes but the written word cannot convey the levity intended. Maybe you should add an emoticon - I just did - its not really me but it does let the reader know you are only joking.
The written word is perfectly, superbly capable of conveying levity!

I agree with Swirly that - though I suppose some people just like using them - you shouldn't have to signal a joke by sticking the visual equivalent of writing "HA HA!" at the end of it (though, in stand-up, Jimmy Tarbuck did used to add a "ho-ho" or "boom-boom" at the end of his jokes to let us know he'd just told one.)

Yet people do take things the wrong way. The ideal solution would probably be people taking more time writing the post to ensure the joke is funny and clear enough not to have to explain it's a joke, and maybe also for people to take more time reading it ... but it's such a fast-paced world, and people do seem inclined to dash things out as rapidly as they can!
Lew Stringer
Posts: 7041
Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 00:59
Contact:

Re: Les Barton

Post by Lew Stringer »

This was nothing to do with missing a joke, needing to "chill out", sensitivity, or anything retroactively labeled as "satire". I was simply, calmly, clarifying my point. No more, no less. :up:
The blog of British comics: http://lewstringer.blogspot.com
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
big bad bri
Posts: 1761
Joined: 03 Mar 2006, 15:50

Re: Les Barton

Post by big bad bri »

swirlythingy wrote: The main thing I find baffling is that I've had a much easier time on every other forum/blog I've posted in - including comic-related ones - apart from Comics UK. There seems to be something particularly sensitive about this site.

I think that may be due to the fact IMO that the majority of posters on this paticular site is of the older generation wheres as other comic forums like beano/dandy is mainly kids.I have seen individuals paticulary hard on swirly.I personally dont mind the misuse of words or incorrect spelling,punchuation marks,capitals etc or any paticulary bad or near the knuckle comments or things said in jest which some individuals dont realise are said in jest because there are more important things in life to worry about and all of us on this site all share a common love of comics & art from our childhoods.
Last edited by AndyB on 03 May 2012, 07:41, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: bb code fix!
User avatar
stevezodiac
Posts: 5210
Joined: 23 May 2006, 20:43
Location: space city

Re: Les Barton

Post by stevezodiac »

Swirly - your frowning avatar doesn't really help matters. Change it to a big happy one. Yes I often send humorous replies to corporate e-mails in my job and get a po-faced response. Having a goon style sense of humour isn't appreciated/understood by all. I sometimes re-read my old e-mails and laugh out loud at my own responses.

PS Swirly when are you going to Waterloo to get the Summer Special? I don't want you to make the journey and then have wasted your time if they've all gone. Some big American tourist might be looking at them right now thinking "Say this is just the kind of British humour that the guys back at the ranch would appreciate in between busting steers, eating beans and trouser trumping across the prairie- i'll buy all ten copies" Hurry.
Attachments
swirly.jpg
User avatar
ISPYSHHHGUY
Posts: 4275
Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
Location: BLITZVILLE, USA

Re: Les Barton

Post by ISPYSHHHGUY »

SATIRE++++++++SATIRE++++++++++SATIRE+++++++++SATIRE++++++++=SATIRE=====




your comments since my last post are very calm, collected, and composed, Gentlemen [and Swirly!]



SATIRE+++++++++SATIRE+++++++++++SATIRE++++++++++SATIRE+++++++SATIRE++++++


There----I bet you are all fed up of this malarkey already!!
User avatar
stevezodiac
Posts: 5210
Joined: 23 May 2006, 20:43
Location: space city

Re: Les Barton

Post by stevezodiac »

A smiley boat will suffice. :)
alanultron5
Posts: 1746
Joined: 29 Dec 2008, 15:58
Location: Wolverhampton
Contact:

Re: Les Barton

Post by alanultron5 »

I can't see anything wrong with said posts! Please continue with the humorous stuff as far as i'm concerned everyone! Cheers! :cheers: :cheers:
A Face unclouded by thought.
Post Reply