Really, that is a shame I thought they may have printed the original then touched it up. Well I hope I don't ruin your day too much Phil, here is another one!philcom55 wrote:That's amazing!![]()
The horrible thing is that all these changes would have been made to the actual artwork (Phil Clarke has probably still got that defaced Tina canvas hidden away in his warehouse somewhere). Sheer cultural vandalism I call it!
- Phil R.
Reprints in Specials
Re: Reprints in Specials
Re: Reprints in Specials
I hope your not bored with these but here's another one, surely they would not have defaced the original artwork just to put that Tina title on?
I guess then, with some of these examples if Mr Clarke does have them and they have been altered, he cannot sell them as original artwork!
I guess then, with some of these examples if Mr Clarke does have them and they have been altered, he cannot sell them as original artwork!
