I'd love to see more of the freaky world of photo strip-era Candy. It really does look quite unsettling from the covers I've seen, and I've often wondered what nightmarish derangements lurk within.philcom55 wrote:Matrix's latest post in the Jack & Jill thread has reminded me of one of the more unusual nursery comics to appear during the 1960s. This was Candy which began its run in January 1967 as a companion title to TV21 and Lady Penelope under the 'Century 21' umbrella. As can be seen in the issue shown below, early numbers were printed in a curious lengthways format, and featured a full colour photo-strip of 'Candy & Andy' on the first three pages. Apparently these life-size puppets were originally created for a proposed Gerry Anderson TV series aimed at younger viewers that never got taken up - which, given their distinctly creepy appearance, was probably just as well. Even the giant teddy bear, Mr. Bearanda, manages to look like a sinister axe murderer!![]()
Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
That is the first 'Jack and Jill and Candy' Phil. Also the one I posted is the last appearance of 'Candy and Andy' like you said a mysterious disappearance!
These scans are from 'Candy' no2 Raven. I thought she looks a bit like that girl in the 'Exorcist' in the photo standing on the chair!
These scans are from 'Candy' no2 Raven. I thought she looks a bit like that girl in the 'Exorcist' in the photo standing on the chair!
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
Oh, the gloomy, depressing, hopelessness of that bear taking those dead-faced children to the bleak woods to finish them off for real.
We must have more of this horror.
We must have more of this horror.
-
Lew Stringer
- Posts: 7041
- Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 00:59
- Contact:
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
Agreed. I remember now I actually had the first few issues because of its Gerry Anderson connection but the experience must have been so disturbing I'd locked away the memories of it in a dark corner on my mind like Doctor Who did with his John Hurt incarnation.Raven wrote:Oh, the gloomy, depressing, hopelessness of that bear taking those dead-faced children to the bleak woods to finish them off for real.
We must have more of this horror.
The biggest question is: why did they bother making life size puppets for this proposed TV series? Why not use child actors? The whole concept is barking mad!
The blog of British comics: http://lewstringer.blogspot.com
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
The funny thing is that at nine old pence Candy must have been one of the most expensive comics around in 1967!
- Phil R.
- Phil R.
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
Here are issues 1,2 and 3 of DC Thomson's Bimbo - one of the first major titles to challenge Fleetway's supremacy in the field of nursery comics during the 1960s:



- Phil Rushton



- Phil Rushton
-
Lew Stringer
- Posts: 7041
- Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 00:59
- Contact:
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
Bimbo was an excellent nursery comic, with great art by Dudley Watkins, Bill Richie, and more. But what it really lacked was a photo strip about grubby looking life-size creepy puppets. 
The blog of British comics: http://lewstringer.blogspot.com
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
- ISPYSHHHGUY
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: 14 Oct 2007, 13:05
- Location: BLITZVILLE, USA
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
BIMBO was 'where it was at', for 'happening' tiny-tot readers----great scans, Phil, from about the time I was concieved ........
Too much information, eh, readers?!
Too much information, eh, readers?!
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
Yes, keep it clean Rab!!ISPYSHHHGUY wrote:BIMBO was 'where it was at', for 'happening' tiny-tot readers----great scans, Phil, from about the time I was concieved ........
Too much information, eh, readers?!
Like these!Lew Stringer wrote:Bimbo was an excellent nursery comic, with great art by Dudley Watkins, Bill Richie, and more. But what it really lacked was a photo strip about grubby looking life-size creepy puppets.
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
And here is the 'Thunderbird' connection also from 'Candy' no2.
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
matrix wrote:Like these!

AAAAGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
...Ahem!

Interesting. It's hard to be sure but the style looks very much like Gerry Embleton.
- Phil Rushton
matrix wrote:And here is the 'Thunderbird' connection also from 'Candy' no2.

Interesting. It's hard to be sure but the style looks very much like Gerry Embleton.
- Phil Rushton
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
What about 'TV Land' does anyone know much about it? I get confused with all the tv comics where does this one fit in?
Not a bad little comic really, most of the panels are in the shape of a tv, I think Jiffy the broomstick man is great!
Not a bad little comic really, most of the panels are in the shape of a tv, I think Jiffy the broomstick man is great!
-
Lew Stringer
- Posts: 7041
- Joined: 01 Mar 2006, 00:59
- Contact:
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
How many weeks was it before Candy's publisher City Magazines/Century 21 realised what an ill advised concept the creepy puppet photo-strip was, replacing it with artwork?
The blog of British comics: http://lewstringer.blogspot.com
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
My website: http://www.lewstringer.com
Blog about my own work: http://lewstringercomics.blogspot.com/
Re: Younger reader comics (the best of the rest)
I'd like to know that too; Denis Gifford just says the format changed in 1968. In fact I can't help wondering why 'Anderson Fan Supreme' Shaqui Le Vesconte hasn't uploaded a detailed history of Candy onto his Technodelic website yet. Surely there can't be something about the subject matter that's putting him off...?Lew Stringer wrote:How many weeks was it before Candy's publisher City Magazines/Century 21 realised what an ill advised concept the creepy puppet photo-strip was, replacing it with artwork?
Come on Shaqui: it's a dirty job, but somebody has to do it!
- Phil R.



