There's definitely a post missing from this thread. I know, because I thought I'd got the ninja edit on my previous post done just in time, only to discover that another post had been made at almost exactly the same time. If you edit a post which is not the last post in a thread, then it gets a "last edited by" banner slapped on the bottom of it, but if it's still the most recent post, you get away with it. The stated last edit date is a good four hours before the first reply.
I don't recall anything untoward about its content. Did it jump or was it pushed?
big bad bri wrote:noo! we donnt want new strips we want classic characters bought back in new stories in fact let beano & dandy bring back classic characters & all the new style strips could go into a new 3rd weekly title because phoenix seems to working ok apart from the subs dept but thompsons seem to have the subs thing sussed
Bri, all I can say is it's a good job you're not the Beano editor. The Beano and Dandy are already struggling to be relevant to the modern age, and they don't need to make things worse by being swallowed whole by their own pasts. Personally I'd have said there wasn't nearly
enough innovation going on.
The Dandy annual is a good vision of what happens when an editor goes "screw it", drops any pretence at his product being aimed at children, and embarks on the futile exercise of trying to woo back yesterday's children instead.
It doesn't work, and in the annual's case it just hurt any potential sales of the weekly comic.